At least we beat Chemestry Chemistry

At least we beat Chemestry

via Language Log

Anyway, that’s only for professors.. so it doesn’t count for professionals, right?

Right?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

8 Comments

  1. nb
    Posted January 27, 2009 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    Hotness had better be of integral type; signed underflow is sooo exploitable!

  2. Posted January 27, 2009 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Here’s hoping it’s a small type, otherwise you’d have to get mighty ugly to pull that off..

  3. Posted January 28, 2009 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    Chemestry!?

    Sounds like someone didn’t beat English…

    Also is it just me or are we missing a subject between Psychology and Finance?

  4. Posted January 28, 2009 at 12:24 am | Permalink

    Oh hey GRAVATARS, I am a night elf.

  5. Posted January 28, 2009 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Ahem.. English is my second language you know. My first being incoherent gurgling (of which I am proficient).

    I also like how the very right of the graph is 0. So regardless of what subject you profess (oh the verbage) your still worse off.

  6. Posted January 28, 2009 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Well sure, if you actually want a positive hotness value you should probably go into stunt driving or marine biology or hip hop MCing…

  7. Posted January 28, 2009 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    How wierd, you’re being coloured like you’re me.

    Probably because you replied to my post and the plugin I’m using (the “Marquer commentaires administrateur”) was never tested with threading.. stupid french crap.

    Merde!

  8. Posted January 28, 2009 at 5:58 pm | Permalink

    as never tested with threading

    And now I’ve disabled threading it will never will be!