Comments on: At least we beat Chemestry Chemistry http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/ Out of the frying pan and into the punch in the face. Fri, 01 Jan 2010 02:15:48 +1300 hourly 1 By: SCdF http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-31 SCdF Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:58:17 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-31 <blockquote> <p>as never tested with threading</p> </blockquote> <p>And now I've disabled threading it will never will be!</p>

as never tested with threading

And now I’ve disabled threading it will never will be!

]]> By: SCdF http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-30 SCdF Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:52:41 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-30 <p>How wierd, you're being coloured like you're me.</p> <p>Probably because you replied to my post and the plugin I'm using (the "Marquer commentaires administrateur") was never tested with threading.. stupid french crap.</p> <p>Merde!</p> How wierd, you’re being coloured like you’re me.

Probably because you replied to my post and the plugin I’m using (the “Marquer commentaires administrateur”) was never tested with threading.. stupid french crap.

Merde!

]]> By: chronic http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-29 chronic Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:45:27 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-29 <p>Well sure, if you actually want a <em>positive</em> hotness value you should probably go into stunt driving or marine biology or hip hop MCing...</p> Well sure, if you actually want a positive hotness value you should probably go into stunt driving or marine biology or hip hop MCing…

]]> By: SCdF http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-28 SCdF Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:08:16 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-28 <p>Ahem.. English is my second language you know. My first being incoherent gurgling (of which I am <em>proficient</em>).</p> <p>I also like how the very right of the graph is 0. So regardless of what subject you profess (oh the verbage) your still worse off.</p> Ahem.. English is my second language you know. My first being incoherent gurgling (of which I am proficient).

I also like how the very right of the graph is 0. So regardless of what subject you profess (oh the verbage) your still worse off.

]]> By: Chronic http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-27 Chronic Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:24:11 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-27 <p>Oh hey GRAVATARS, I am a night elf.</p> Oh hey GRAVATARS, I am a night elf.

]]> By: Chronic http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Chronic Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:23:54 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-26 <p>Chemestry!?</p> <p>Sounds like someone didn't beat English...</p> <p>Also is it just me or are we missing a subject between Psychology and Finance?</p> Chemestry!?

Sounds like someone didn’t beat English…

Also is it just me or are we missing a subject between Psychology and Finance?

]]> By: SCdF http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-25 SCdF Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:47:46 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-25 <p>Here's hoping it's a small type, otherwise you'd have to get <em>mighty</em> ugly to pull that off..</p> Here’s hoping it’s a small type, otherwise you’d have to get mighty ugly to pull that off..

]]> By: nb http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/2009/01/27/at-least-we-beat-chemestry/comment-page-1/#comment-24 nb Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:28:21 +0000 http://blog.mylittlepwnage.com/?p=169#comment-24 <p>Hotness had better be of integral type; signed underflow is <em>sooo</em> exploitable!</p> Hotness had better be of integral type; signed underflow is sooo exploitable!

]]>